Kyntronics Hybrid Electro-Hydraulic Actuators (SHA) Compared to Electro-Mechanical Screw-Type Actuators (EMA)

Kyntronics Hybrid Electro-Hydraulic Actuators (SHA) Compared to Electro-Mechanical Screw-Type Actuators (EMA)

Kyntronics Hybrid Electro-Hydraulic Linear Actuators (SHA) provide a reliable, high-performance solution that outperforms conventional screw-type actuators. They are designed to eliminate the common reliability challenges often associated with screw-type systems. The comparison below outlines the key features and benefits of both actuation technologies.

Ball Screw / Roller Screw Electro-Mechanical Actuators (EMA)

Ball Screw and Roller Screw actuators (EMAs) are a commonly used linear motion solution. These systems are deployed where precision control is required and often as a replacement for hydraulic cylinders in some higher force applications.

 

Screw-type actuators are susceptible to damage from shock loads and premature wear, causing unplanned downtime and reliability issues.  Screw-type EMA challenges include:

  • Gears, roller and ball screws, and other mechanical components wear out due to metal-to-metal contact from repetitive concentrated loads.
  • Shock loads and Side loading can cause significant damage and premature failure.
  • EMAs require regular lubrication and have a finite life (see L10 chart below).
  • EMAs require expensive load cells for accurate force control.
  • EMAs require a brake to hold position, otherwise can be back-driven and have backlash.
  • They are large & very costly at higher loads (>5,000lbf).
  • Have limited stroke length (24”) without incurring expensive premiums.

broken screw-type actuators

Kyntronics Hybrid Electro-Hydraulic Actuator (SHA)

The SHA is an “electric linear actuator” that resembles a screw-type actuator. However, instead of using gears, drive screws, and driven nuts, the SHA utilizes an integral hydraulic cylinder with a minimal amount of fluid and there are no hoses or leak points. 

Read Kyntronics’ Insights: ELECTRO-MECHANICAL ACTUATORS (EMAs) AND KYNTRONICS ACTUATORS: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES

Reliability Comparison – Kyntronics Hybrid Electro-Hydraulic Actuator (SHA) vs Electro-Mechanical Ball Screw / Roller Screw Actuator (EMA)

Actuator Reliability Comparison

Electro-Mechanical Actuator (EMA)

  • EMA life span is load-dependent. Improving EMA life requires larger and more expensive screws
  • EMA metal-to-metal wear further decreases reliability and requires regular lubrication
  • EMAs are highly susceptible to damage from shock loads and side-loading

Kyntronics Hybrid Electro-Hydraulic Actuator (SHA) 

  • SHA is rated at 50,000,000 inches of travel (before a simple rod seal change), regardless of load
  • No metal-to-metal contact leads to increased reliability (load independent)
  • The SHA provides 10X-100X better reliability compared with Ball Screw / Roller Screw Actuators

Cost Comparison at Different Force Ratings – Kyntronics Hybrid Electro-Hydraulic Actuator (SHA) vs Electro-Mechanical Roller Screw Actuator (EMA)

Actuator Cost Comparison at Different Force Ratings

Cost Assumptions

  • Includes Actuator, Servo Motor, Servo Drive
  • 24″ Stoke Length, add 15% Premium to Roller Screw if longer
  • Standard Configuration, Standard L10 Roller Screw Life
  • Cost Amounts are Approximate Distributor Net Cost

The SHA is available in many flexible configurations, unlike screw-type EMAs

Discuss your application with an Engineer and learn how the all-electric, Hybrid Electro-Hydraulic Actuator (SHA) can eliminate screw-type actuator reliability issues, contact Kyntronics.