Kyntronics Hybrid Electro-Hydraulic Actuators (SHA) Compared to Electro-Mechanical Screw-Type Actuators (EMA)

Kyntronics Hybrid Electro-Hydraulic Linear Actuators (SHA) are a robust “electric” alternative to screw-type actuators. The features and benefits of these two actuation technologies are compared below.

Ball Screw / Roller Screw Electro-Mechanical Actuators (EMA)

Ball Screw and Roller Screw actuators (EMAs) are a commonly-used linear motion solution. These systems are deployed where precision control is required and often as a replacement for hydraulic cylinders in some higher force applications.

 

Screw-Type actuators are susceptible to damage from shock loads and premature wear causing unplanned downtime and reliability issues.

 

Screw-Type EMA Challenges

  • Gears, roller and ball screws and other mechanical components wear out from metal-to-metal contact from repetitive concentrated loads.
  • Shock loads and Side loading can cause significant damage and premature failure.
  • EMAs require regular lubrication and have a finite life (see L10 chart below).
  • EMAs require expensive load cells for accurate force control.
  • EMAs require a brake to hold position, can be back-driven and have backlash.
  • Are large & very costly at higher loads (>5,000lbf).
  • Have limited stroke length (24”) without incurring expensive premiums.

Hybrid Electro-Hydraulic Actuator (SHA)

The SHA is an “electric linear actuator” that looks similar to a screw-type actuator but rather than using gears, drive screws and driven nuts, the SHA uses an integral hydraulic cylinder with a minimal amount of fluid and no hoses or leak points.

Compare Hybrid SHAs to EMAs

The SHA combines the Best Features of Screw-Type EMAs and Hydraulic Actuators while Eliminating their Shortcomings

 

Kyntronics Hybrid Electro-Hydraulic Actuator (SHA) vs Electro-Mechanical Ball Screw / Roller Screw Actuator (EMA)

Actuator Reliability Comparison

Reliability graph

  • Ball Screw Actuator
  • Roller Screw Actuator
  • Kyntronics Hybrid Electro-Hydraulic Actuator (SHA)

 

Electro-Mechanical Actuator (EMA)

EMA life span is load dependent. Improving EMA life requires larger and more expensive size screws
EMA metal-to-metal wear further decreases reliability and requires regular lubrication
EMAs are highly susceptible to damage from shock loads and side-loading

Kyntronics Hybrid Electro-Hydraulic Actuator (SHA)

SHA is rated at 50,000,000 inches of travel (before a simple rod seal change) regardless of load
No metal-to-metal contact leads to increased reliability (load independent)
The SHA provides 10X-100X better reliability compared with Ball Screw / Roller Screw Actuators

Kyntronics Hybrid Electro-Hydraulic Actuator (SHA) vs Electro-Mechanical Roller Screw Actuator (EMA)

Cost Comparison at Different Force Ratings

Compare Hybrid SHAs to EMAs

  • Roller Screw EMA
  • Kyntronics Hybrid Electro-Hydraulic Actuator

Cost Assumptions

  • Includes Actuator, Servo Motor, Servo Drive
  • 24″ Stoke Length, add 15% Premium to Roller Screw if longer
  • Standard Configuration, Standard L10 Roller Screw Life
  • Cost Amounts are Approximate Distributor Net Cost

The SHA is available in many flexible configurations unlike screw-type EMAs

Configurations available are:

  • Parallel Standard
  • Parallel with Spacer Block
  • 90° Centered
  • Parallel Inverted
  • Inline
  • 90° Behind Power Unit

 

 

Discuss your application with an Engineer and learn how the all-electric, Hybrid Electro-Hydraulic Actuator (SHA) can eliminate screw-type actuator reliability issues, contact Kyntronics.